• Numbers.lkBetaSri Lanka in Numbers
Desk
  • Home
Reporting
  • Write-ups
  • Takeaways
Trackers
  • Exchange Rates
  • Inflation
  • Credit Ratings
  • Bank Ratings
Maps
  • Internet Speeds
Tools
  • Income Tax Calculator
  • Loan Installment
  • Electricity Bill Calculator
  • Water Bill Calculator
  • Internet Speed Test
Write-ups
Numbers.lkSri Lanka in Numbers

Reporting

  • News
  • Analysis
  • Explainers
  • Write-ups
  • Takeaways

Trackers

  • Exchange Rates
  • Inflation
  • Credit Ratings
  • Bank Ratings
  • Internet Speeds

Tools

  • All Tools
  • Income Tax
  • Loan Installment
  • Electricity
  • Water
  • Speed Test

Company

  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms

© 2019–2026 Numbers.lk

Sri Lanka in numbers, context, and plain English.

Numbers.lk logo

Numbers.lk

@numberslka

🔍 Fate of 1,000 BYD Atto 3 EVs 🚗 : Sri Lanka’s 🇱🇰 Rs. 4 billion classification dispute

⭕ ~1,000 BYD Atto 3 EVs detained by Customs since July 2025 due to a motor-capacity classification dispute worth Rs. 4 billion in potential additional taxes.

⭕ The core issue: Do these imported BYD Atto 3s have 100 kW or 150 kW motors?

⭕ BYD declared them as 100 kW models, but Customs suspects they’re with 150 kW motors firmware-limited to 100 kW output.

⭕ According to JKH CG Auto, importer and agent for BYD Sri Lanka, the cars were shipped directly from BYD in China as the same 100 kW models supplied to other international markets like Singapore.

⭕ That statement sidesteps the technical question. Does it have the same motor as the 150kW model?

⭕ Different countries use different standards for motor-power classification for customs and taxation purposes:

- Nepal 🇳🇵: “Motor peak power”
- Singapore 🇸🇬: “Power Rating/Maximum Power Output”
- Sri Lanka 🇱🇰: “Capacity of motors”

⭕ Thus, the same vehicle configuration can have different kW power for customs and taxation purposes depending on each country’s tariff language.

⭕ Sri Lanka’s tariff language clearly points to the combined raw capacity (nameplate/rated capacity) of the motor for excise duty.

⭕ Recent precedent: Nissan X-Trail dispute, two motors deliver 157 kW to the wheels but have a combined motor capacity of 250 kW. They are taxed on capacity of 250 kW basis.

⭕ If tax were based on software-limited output, manufacturers could simply under configure to fall below thresholds (even under 50 kW), creating a major loophole.

⭕Classification disputes are routine in customs and revenue agencies, and these classifications decisions are not arbitrary. The World Customs Organization (WCO) sets classification guidelines through the Harmonized System, ensuring that countries worldwide follow the same foundational standards for international trade.

⭕ Under Sri Lankan case law, an importer’s HS-code declaration is provisional. Customs must verify and may adjust it if required.. Importers pay any additional duties to release goods - no penalty applies unless there was willful misclassification.

⭕ For prolonged disputes, importers can furnish a bank guarantee for the disputed amount and obtain release without putting their customers at the middle of it.

⭕ On the other hand, considering that BYD is currently facing the same issue with the same car in Nepal 🇳🇵- where the tariff language is very similar to Sri Lanka’s -it’s surprising that the local agent hasn’t sought an “advance ruling,” whereby Customs issues an HS code for a particular product before importation to avoid classification disputes after the importation.

⭕ As the world’s best‐selling car manufacturer, BYD produces great vehicles, but all technical evidence in this case is not in favor of BYD/JKH.

⭕ Sri Lanka’s vehicle-tax policy focuses solely on maximizing revenue. EVs are the future, A more rational EV-tax and, more broadly, vehicle-tax policy is needed.

⭕ Short-term revenue gains at the expense of people’s wealth tied up in depreciating liabilities like cars have been among the worst things affecting Sri Lanka’s economy for decades. The failure of Sri Lanka’s economic policymakers to consider this from a macroeconomic perspective is truly saddening for the country.

#SriLanka #BYD

03 Aug 2025, 07:35

Sources

  1. Original post on X — Numbers.lk (@numberslka)

Comments51

Reply on Facebook
  1. Do we have any update on this

    about 1 year ago
  2. The issue here isn’t with BYD or Customs, it clearly lies with Browns. This is the same game every major company in the country plays. But this time, they’ve slipped up, mainly because the usual corrupt officers are now too scared to get involved. As a responsible organization, Browns should have known the rules and regulations. They should have sought proper advice and communicated with Customs before importing a 150kW vehicle that had been downgraded to 100kW through software. This is Sri Lanka, mate people here have even converted their Nissan Leafs to run on petrol. It’s only a matter of time before someone flashes the firmware back to 150kW.

Recent writeups

All writeups
about 1 year ago
  • This article (last 3 points) is a good eye opener on what type of assets the country’s wealth is locked in (prefer the term counter productive assets to depreciating liabilities). Result of consumerism, used for the advantage of vehicle importers (though BYD/JKH is yet to be proved, still it’s an open secret that for ages most of the importers were circumventing import taxes thru various means and violating exchange control laws). All the more reason, for the authorities to stop and rethink the importance of a public transport system and roads network comparable to developed countries to make the public think twice before investing in private vehicles at exorbitant prices, but invest in productive assets. The reduced demand would make the prices fall, hence affordable for those who really need a private vehicle (elderly, living in distant locations where public transport is not developed). Riding on short term govt revenue from vehicle imports is a real trap.

    about 1 year ago
  • Need a little clarification.. Can the SL Customs test these motors separately from the vehicle itself? If so, what is the legal background for a such practice? As far as I understand, Under the HS convention, which Sri Lanka also signed several decades ago, a product imported under a certain HS code and with the manufacturer COC should be treated or tested as a single unit. Components of that product / Item should not be tested / evaluated separately. Plz correct me If I'm wrong.

    about 1 year ago
  • Can BYD update the firmware afterwards to allow the output to be exceeded 100kw? If that is the case ……🤔

    about 1 year ago
  • They should import the car and the motor separately and then install in Sri Lanka

    about 1 year ago
  • Chameera Prashad Haputhantri දැන් MK

    about 1 year ago
  • When importing a fossil fuel vehicle, do the customs accept the value stated by the manufacturer for cylinder capacity? If yes, then by that logic they should accept the power stated by the manufacturer (BYD in this case).

    about 1 year agoLikes:6
  • All the confusion here is because these clever idiots think this is as simple as spinning a toy motor with a pen-torch battery 😂 — hence asking to “just bring the motor.” That’s like asking someone to bring only the crankshaft and engine block instead of the whole engine. You can’t separate the motor from the controller. They might look separate, but functionally, they’re joined at the hip

    about 1 year agoLikes:2
  • we are more technological advanced country than Singapore and rest of the World. Tax for capacity of Motors...soon we will be taxed for Overclocked Processors also.

    about 1 year agoLikes:4
  • What they have to check now is whether the motors on these vehicles are actually detuned to 100kw or not. If so then I don't see an issue. But if not it's definitely a serious matter for the authorities.

    about 1 year agoLikes:1
  • විහින් කෙලව ගන්න හදන්නේ. On what technial test or basis do the customs make that claim? Do they have any acceptable tests to verify it's a 150 ? Or as usual they just go by suspecting things and assume they are right. We all know what a shit hole and corrupt department the SL customs are. They are good at stealing apples and oranges from housemaids coming from middle east after working for ages in the scrounging heat environment for their children which they haven't seen in years. That's customs of Sri Lanka for you.

    about 1 year agoLikes:1
  • If petrol cars are taxed based on how big their engines are, then EVs should also be taxed based on their actual motor capacity not what’s limited by software. Fair’s fair.

    about 1 year agoLikes:9
    1. Himash Deemantha ✅

      about 1 year ago
  • It should be maximum power output in any scenario ( for hybrids , EVs or IC vehicles). needs a simple and effective tax method . We saw that dumb taxes with Nissan X trail and now with BYDs .why people pay more taxes to something they can't consume

    about 1 year ago
  • Not only Singapore & Nepal but Turkey also follows . Uneducated, corrupted Sri Lankan customs don’t aware of it.

    about 1 year agoLikes:1
  • A failed nation rub by worn outs.

    about 1 year ago
  • This scenario isn’t that simple. The main victims are the customers who placed orders and are eagerly waiting for their vehicles. Even for Customs, it’s not easy as they have to follow the import rules In Sri Lanka (not other countries). If the importer had clearly said the motor is 150 kW but limited to 100 kW, the cost could have been sorted before orders. (Still nothing is confirmed). Assume with the new tax the Atto ends up around 20 million, customers would have had plenty of other options in that range. In a country where tax rules change often and illegally assembled cars are common, we also can’t say the firmware is fully secure. If taxes change in the future, current buyers might even unlock the full capacity. As of now, we still don’t know the actual motor capacity, but clearly, the customers are the ones suffering most.

    about 1 year agoLikes:1
    1. Numbers.lk

      Due to the nature of the dispute, the additional tax must be either approximately 4 million dollars or zero; there can be no middle ground. It must be interpreted one way or the other.

      about 1 year agoLikes:2
    2. Numbers.lk Yes, that’s correct. If it’s proven that the physical unit is 100 kW, there won’t be any additional costs. But if it turns out the actual motor is 150 kW, there’s a strong possibility the tax will be recalculated based on that. The bigger concern is what happens to vehicles that have already been cleared and are on the road. If this had been transparent from the beginning, clarifying any discrepancies between the actual motor capacity and firmware limitations, such situations could have been avoided. Customs could have applied the correct tax upfront, ensuring customers got the right price from the start. Hope the investigations conclude fast, as both new buyers and those who already own these vehicles are waiting to see the outcome.

      about 1 year ago
  • SL custom is not technically good for understanding EV functions; it relies on just mechanically labeled numbers. And SL is surprisingly tightening all EV consumption by imposing lots of unnecessary restrictions, which shows it is just backing other vehicle mafia sales rather than trusted companies that directly import and give good service. With all this taxation, restrictions, and artificial market value, it's so hard for us to acquire new future technology, even existing ones.

    about 1 year agoLikes:5
    1. Shahiq Ahamed these govt. officials will never allow sri lanka to develop. They are a bunch of selfish ego maniacs

      about 1 year agoLikes:1
    2. Shahiq Ahamed yes the law and law enforcement promotes mafia sale goons to rule vehicle trade may be for a reason. This is to break the back bone of ev trade since it became popular with very advanced digital options not seen before.

      about 1 year ago
  • How do you imply LK Customs classification is for Combined Raw capacity of the Motor? Is it because Nissan X-trail Case? Customs Ordinance Chapter 87 page 28 only referers to "Vehicles, with only Electric Motor for Propulsion, Powered By Onboard Accumulators charged by External Electric source (eg: National Grid), not more than 3 years old: Capacity Of Motors Exceeding 50kW but Not Exceeding 100kW" . So now, we have everything that defines the combined vehicle and the source of power to the Motor but you want to measure the power of the Motor seperately? As language clearly says it is more of the Motor on the car, powered by onboard accumulators, but not the motor taken separately. In this case, no one has a doubt that Motor on the car will have a peak output of 100kW which is limited by the Inverter through firmware limitations. Let’s forget about confusion of the language, what about international standards relevant to the matter? SAE, WLTP and UNECE points and accept Motor Power rating as a combined unit of the vehicle. We could interpret all these technicalities as a loophole in customs classification, then so be it. If it is a loophole smart businessmen will take advantage of it, no harm done if it fits the current law. If the law is not strengthened enough to capture these, it is the responsibility of those who write them to be good at their job.

    about 1 year agoLikes:2
    1. Numbers.lk

      Gayan Kavirathne When it comes to taxation, Sri Lankan law refers to the “capacity of motors,” not output. In Nepal, the term is “motor peak power,” a similar phrase interpreted under the same guidelines. That’s why there are ongoing disputes in both Nepal and Sri Lanka. In Singapore, as noted above, they classify by output which is probably the better way to assess vehicle power but Sri Lanka’s legislation doesn’t allow for that. The Finance Ministry, through the Department of Investment and Trade Policy (which drafts these laws), should revise the language. Simply put: if these vehicles use the same 150 kW motor even if it’s firmware-limited to 100 kW they must pay the taxes for a 150 kW car. That’s the bottom line under current law. Nepal Same issue: https://english.pardafas.com/chinese-electric-vehicle-importers-under-special-surveillance-amid-revenue-concerns

      about 1 year ago
    2. Numbers.lk If you can read my comment again, Customs classification clearly points the source of power for the motor. Thus the capacity has to be measured according to it on the vehicle connected to the referred power source. We don’t have to confuse it with Nepal’s “Peak Power”. As per the usual manufacturing practices of Power Electronics the same PMSM coupled with a different inverter will give more than 150kW for sure. What do you do then? Debate would be then “Do you believe BYDs software Limit” Or “Do you believe BYDs label on Motor”

      about 1 year ago
    3. Numbers.lk I had clearly quoted the Sri Lankan customs current classification rule governing the ATTO3 in my comment.

      about 1 year ago
    4. Gayan Kavirathne agreed and we should alligned to software limit.

      about 1 year agoLikes:1
    5. Eng. Musthalie Shaheed Its sad to see people spreading mal information about widespread Eng. Practices.

      about 1 year agoLikes:1
    6. 2 more replies
  • In a Synchronous motor (like one in the BYD and other EVs), the motor must include the controller since it cannot function as a motor without the controller in an EV. Also everything today is software controlled. Even with the 150KW version of BYD, teh maximum output will be limited by the controller and not the mechanical parts of the motor. If you remove / modify the controller, even with this motor you will be able to get more than 150Kw since these are manufacturer with some tolerance. Teh whole argument now is based on teh manufacturers label on the mechanical part of the motor saying that its 150Kw. If that label can be trusted, why not trust the firmware limitations imposed by the manufacturer.

    about 1 year agoLikes:12
  • අපි හිතමු 150 kw motor එක firmware එකෙන් 100 kw වලට ලිමිට් කරලා එනවා කියලා. එතකොට අපේ custom එකෙන් 150 kw වලට tax කලොත් අන්තිමට userta ලැබෙන්නේ 100 kw. ඉතින් 150 kw tax එකක් ගෙවලා අන්තිමට ලැබෙන්නේ 100 kw නන් අනිවාර්යෙන් මේකට නඩු යන්න තමයි වෙන්නේ

    about 1 year agoLikes:8
    1. Gihan Indrajith Gomes post eke 6 weni point eken oka gana tma kiyne, SL tax wenne motor capacity ekata, final motor output ekata newei kyla

      about 1 year agoLikes:2
  • You are correct! I've been saying this since the beginning. It's not only the JKCG is at fault. There are other importers too. It is surprising for not seeking an advanced ruling, which is the customs procedure in importing a new vehicle when there is confusion about it and the previous ATTO 3 was imported at 150 KW. All importers should have the right to play in fair ground! That's how the fair competition benefits the consumer, Monopoly is not the way to do business!!!! However, given the circumstances I don't think that they had done it purposely. Using the loophole has become the practise of car importers and all the importers here. If any particular vehicle model is available with the same motor and the battery capacity and part number anywhere in the world, the customs should take the highest declared by the manufacturer in any country, not the software controlled figure which can be changed at any point. Customs should announce these capacity figures for the available models in public as well. And then the unit rate should be adjusted to keep the terry for electric vehicles cheaper than the equivalent ice and hybrid, which is the global practise!!!

    about 1 year agoLikes:9
    1. Sujeeva Premaratne අපි හිතමු 150 kw motor එක firmware එකෙන් 100 kw වලට ලිමිට් කරලා එනවා කියලා. එතකොට අපේ custom එකෙන් 150 kw වලට tax කලොත් අන්තිමට userta ලැබෙන්නේ 100 kw. ඉතින් 150 kw tax එකක් ගෙවලා අන්තිමට ලැබෙන්නේ 100 kw නන් අනිවාර්යෙන් මේකට නඩු යන්න තමයි වෙන්නේ

      about 1 year agoLikes:3
    2. Sujeeva Premaratne The parallel importors could get the vehicle from Singapore or Nepal where the 100Kw version is available and pay teh relavant lower tax.

      about 1 year agoLikes:1
    3. Chathura De Silva Nepal also there is a case. Singapore price is much higher than Sri Lanka. No point importing from.

      about 1 year ago
    4. Gihan Indrajith Gomes මගේ කමෙන්ට් එක හරියට කියවන්න ඔය ගැටළුවට උත්තරේ එතන තියෙනවා.

      about 1 year ago
    5. Sujeeva Premaratne Singapore price is higher because of the COE. That get refunded prportionally when deregistered for export.

      about 1 year ago
    6. 1 more reply
  • Arosha Rodrigo

    about 1 year agoLikes:1
  • Claiming ev's as the future Isnt it bit premature given the current Sri lankan settings 🤷

    about 1 year agoLikes:5
  • EV motors typically have a much higher capacity than their rated power. Many manufacturers use the same motor across different models, adjusting the power output through firmware

    about 1 year agoLikes:1
  • All 51 comments

    Recent writeups

    All writeups
    1. 14Oct🇱🇰🏎️ Yevan David Takes a Step Forward in Formula 3, Joins Van Amersfoort Racing for 2027⭕ Sri Lankan racing driver Yevan David, 19, will join Dutch outfit Van Amersfoort Racing (VAR) for his second FIA Formula 3 season, moving...
    2. 14Oct🇱🇰🏖️ Sri Lanka Tops Asia’s Best Beaches in 2026🏆 Asia’s Top 10 Beaches in 2026 1. 🇱🇰 Arugam Bay Beach, Sri Lanka ❤️ 2. 🇹🇭 Railay Beach, Thailand 3. 🇲🇾 Coral Beach, Malaysia 4....
    3. 12OctSri Lanka 🇱🇰 spent less than 30% of its 2026 capital allocation through September - EconomyNext⭕ Sri Lanka 🇱🇰 allocated Rs.1,380 billion for capital spending in 2026 - to fund infrastructure and other public investment. ⭕ First...
    4. 11Oct🇱🇰 From Classrooms to the Army: For the First Time in History, Sri Lanka Army Honours Its Top Contributing Schools⭕ The Sri Lanka Army has recognized 12 schools for producing the highest number of currently serving Army officers and soldiers, during...